January 30, 2008

Nuts!

We hope readers can spare the time - it's a long one today, and it's all about the Napleton give-away.



We are going to begin with a positive shout out to 2nd Ward Alderman Rich DiPietro. We are told the Lord of the Manor stuck to his guns and ultimately voted against the Napleton give-away. After explaining the proper motion procedures for dissenting committee chairman to his fellow council members, Finance and Budget chairman DiPietro then referred the Napleton motion to fellow Finance and Budget committee member, Alderman Tom Carey - the Unfriendly Ghost from the 6th Ward - who then referred the motion to 4th Ward Alderman Jim Allspaghetti - who is not a member of the Finance and Budget committee - who then finally moved to motion the Napleton matter before the council, and then moved to amend the Napleton motion to include an escalation.

Did everybody get all that?

DiPietro went on to explain his "thoughts and feelings" about the deal, and that by his calculations the amended deal only allowed for a 2% escalation each year, which DiPietro said he didn't think was enough and that, though he would be voting in favor of the amendment, he would not be voting in favor of the main motion - the final Napleton give-away.

When Allspaghetti was asked to explain how the escalation was arrived at in his amendment, Allspaghetti was quick to give "credit" to Mayor Howard Frimark for having "sat down with Napleton to get more for the city".




When all faces in the room turned to the Mayor for further explanation of his fabulous negotiating skills, Mayor Howard let it be known that Napleton told him "cars go up about 2% per year."



Clearly, when it comes to 'The Art of the Deal', Donald Trump's got nothing on this Mayor! Of course, nobody bothered to ask the Mayor if he'd made any effort to independently verify the information from Napleton because everybody can be pretty certain that he didn't. And we all know how Mayor Howard hates to micromanage things.

Benedict Alderman Robert Ryan (5th ward), offered that the Napleton deal was "fairly consistent with the other deal at Greenwood and Dempster", and thereby demonstrated to all present that he does in fact read the local papers, and he can sometimes offer an opinion without being expressly directed by the Mayor and/or City Manager.




Once again, the men of the hour at the city council meeting were Aldermen Schmidtzkrieg (1st ward) and the Wsoooool man (7th ward). If it weren't for these two council members, the citizens of Park Ridge wouldn't have any consistent representation in city government at all. They continue to deliver the representation goods.



Both Schmidtzkrieg and Wsoooool man made every effort to dissuade their council peers from going down the dubious path of providing private business with gifts of taxpayer dollars.

The Wsoooool man deftly explained that this was a bad deal for the City of Park Ridge, by noting that the $400,000 being given to Napleton would return a mere $540,000 upon completion of the deal. But that if the city were to put that same $400,000 in a regular bank account earning somewhere around 3% interest, the return to the city would be much better. The Wsoooool man then repeated a question he'd asked earlier, "How is this deal to the benefit of the city?"

The Wsoooool man also asked Mr. Napleton if he would be willing to waive his right to protest his property tax assessment on his Greenwood and Busse property for the duration of the deal, since that could have the effect of reducing the property taxes paid to the city. Mr. Napleton indignantly refused, bemoaning the increases in taxes on his property, and saying that Napleton files a property assessment complaint every year.

Mr. Napleton also indignantly refused to answer when Alderman Schmidtzkrieg asked Mr. Napleton the price for the property being sold to PRC Partners. Mr. Napleton responded by saying, "That's none of your business!" Mr. Napleton then asked Alderman Schmidtzkrieg, "How much did you pay for your house?!" Schmidtzkrieg replied, "Hey, that is none of your business. I'm not the one here asking you for money!" Though Mr. Napleton did answer that the property being sold to PRC Partners was appraised between $4 million and $5 million.

The PRU Crew's got news for everybody - property sales prices are a matter of public record; it's the figure upon which property transfer taxes are calculated and collected by municipalities, and the figure upon which Cook County bases your assessment and calculates your property tax bill. And if you are sick and twisted, like certain members of the Crew, you can read through the property transfers when they are printed in the local papers.

And the PRU Crew has very special news for Mr. Napleton; not only are property sales prices a matter of public record, but so are property assessment complaints; including the appraisal figures used to argue for the assessment reductions being sought - assuming of course, that Napleton goes the usual route of contracting for a new appraisal every three years as part of their assessment complaint process...

Seven residents rose to address the council regarding the Napleton deal. All seven of those residents raised their objections to the deal. But resident Steve Schildwachter best summed up the matter by saying, "This sounds like corporate welfare."

The vote on the amendment to the Napleton deal was 6 to 1, with Schmidtzkrieg voting "no".

The council then returned to discussion of the main motion at which time the Unfriendly Ghost from the 6th ward put on a rather impressive display of his skill at memorization. As Alderman Tom Carey ran through a prepared list of rhetorical and actual questions, the city manager was given the opportunity to regale the entire assembly with bullshit propaganda. Murmurs heard throughout the audience and reported to us are that Mr. Carey's list of questions were probably not his own; the language used was decidedly un-Carey-teristic of the Unfriendly Ghost; many believe the questions were designed to give the Mayor and City Manager "soft targets" to hit the stump on Napleton's behalf.

And again, Mr. Carey, the Crew believes you may be salvageable. But until you let go of the Mayor's coattails and get yourself clean from behaving like a trust fund junkie, you aren't going to cut it.

Schmidtzkrieg also introduced an amendment to remove language from the deal giving Napleton the entire $2.4 million they were asking for. That amendment was defeated in a 4 (Bach, Allegretti, Ryan and Carey) to 3 (Schmidt, DiPietro and Wsol) vote.

When the council finally returned to the main motion of the Napleton deal, all the amending and motioning and numbers just became too much for the Unfriendly Ghost, Alderman Tom Carey. This 33.33...% representative on the Finance and Budget committee just could not grasp the addition of all those big numbers, and admitted he was confused and offered that maybe the matter "merits a deferral so it can be fully understood".




Mayor Howard offered that Mr. Carey "had to understand", and repeated to Mr. Carey the numbers in the deal that Mr. Carey had just admitted to not understanding. It then appeared to become understood by Mr. Carey that it was time for him to be quiet.

Which then left the spotlight to, by all accounts, the star of the evening - 3rd Ward Alderman Don DreadBach. In what can only be described as "DreadBach Unplugged" (we've also heard, "unglued" and "unhinged"), DreadBach began his statement by remarking that he had been uncertain about what to do with regard to his vote on the Napleton deal. So, he did what he says he always does, "I asked my constituents". DreadBach revealed that there are 30 people on the planet who support the Napleton give-away, and all 30 of those people live in the 3rd ward of Park Ridge.




Then DreadBach let it be known that he drives a Cadillac, and that he bought his Cadillac from Napleton, but the next time he buys a Cadillac he was going elsewhere. So too would the people of Park Ridge! He told Mr. Napleton that he (Napleton) had lied to the council, and disrespected the council and the people of Park Ridge! But that he, Don DreadBach, would be voting in favor of the deal.

Or more succinctly stated, "Thank you Sir! May I have another! Here's your money!"

With DreadBach's moment on center stage having come to a close, a final vote on the Napleton deal commenced.

Wsooool man voted "no", Schmidtzkrieg voted "no", the Lord of the Manor voted "no", DreadBach voted "yes", Allspaghetti voted "yes", Benedict Ryan voted "yes", and after a moments hesitation the Unfriendly Ghost voted..."present".

After a brief thud of realization descended upon the room...

Mayor Howard Frimark, whose administration will soon be conducting a budget workshop at which his administration will have to find a way to eliminate a $600,000 budget deficit, while also managing nearly $47,000,000 in total city debt that is costing the city close to $5,000,000 in annual interest...

Mayor Howard Frimark, "artful negotiator" of a whopping 2% equivalent annual rate of return on this "investment" in the Napleton car dealership for the people of Park Ridge...

Mayor Howard Frimark, receiver of a $1,000.00 campaign contribution from Napleton Cadillac...

Mayor Howard Frimark, preeminent representative of the people of Park Ridge...

Mayor Howard Frimark cast the tie-breaking "yes" vote to give Napleton Cadillac $2.4 million dollars of the Park Ridge taxpayer's money over the next 15 years.

40 comments:

Anonymous said...

Come on PRU this has to be made up.

Anonymous said...

Great recap PU.
What a f*cked up deal.
Dump the whole lot of them at first chance!!!

Anonymous said...

I cannot put the words together to express my disgust at the actions of the City Council. BUT...I know that I am very appreciate of all of you at PRU for your hard work in bringing this to us.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to be able to say "someday we will look back on all of this and laugh" but it's all really too sad. It's never funny to be ignored, and to me the little majority of this council is all about ignoring the citizens of PR. We are all STUCK with these "representatives" for now. Everyone should be very very thoughtful when they vote in the next election. And I hope that sites like this will educate us all a bit on the candidates and their lurking tendencies and ties. Say what you will about the old 14 member council, but the fiasco of Monday night would NOT have happened on their watch.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 7:39

Yes it’s hard to believe, but I was there. PRU gives an accurate blow by blow description.

Anonymous said...

1. At least we don't have to read the local press anymore.

2. Three years from now this will all be forgotten and Frimark will cruise to victory on another campaign of misinformation and misdirection.

3. Kudos to PRU.

Anonymous said...

No need to wait three years. The mayoral election is 14 months away. "Calling Larry Friel. Dr. Friel. Please report for duty."

Anonymous said...

the mayor election is in only 14 months? uhhhh...we gotta get moving!

Anonymous said...

After watching him in action, "What about Frank Wsol?" I think Frank would make a great mayor!

Anonymous said...

We need to make sure that the next mayoral candidate we back does not make his money through the town of Park Ridge! That is the only way we are going to eliminate the carpetbaggers!

KaiserSosay said...

Fear not, someone will step up and run against Howard. I'm sure of it!

I also think it is worth discussing the notion of circulating petitions to stagger the terms of the aldermen.

It makes zero sense that all seven come up for re-election at the same time. The Park District staggers terms, as does both School Boards.

It's not a recall election, just a referendum (on the November ballot) to stagger the terms.

3 aldermen up in 2009 and the remaining 4 up in 2011 (as all seven are now).

How about wards 2,4,6 up first in 2009?


Regardless of how one feels about their alderman it is better government to have the terms staggered. That way every two years there would four positions up for election. Three + the Mayor in 2009 and the odd numbered aldermen in 2011.

What do you think?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

We think your assessment of the situation is spot on.

Anonymous said...

Kaiser,

Yes, yes, yes get me the petitions.

Anonymous said...

WHERE do I sign?
HOW MANY petitions can I get to have my friends and neighbors sign?

Anonymous said...

So here is a question. How is it that the council can give away $2.4 million on one vote by a simple majority? Ordinances require 2 readings. Some actions of the city, such as spending amounts in excess of $20,000 not already in the budget, require 2/3 vote. So why was the Napleton giveaway ok?

Anonymous said...

Kaiser is right. It may be more important to stagger the aldermanic terms than it is to get rid of Frimark, because even if Frimark loses his stooges are still in charge.

Anonymous said...

Napleton gave $1,000 to Howard's campaign. Napleton asks for millions from the City. Howard leads the City's negotiating team with Napleton that recommends the $2.4 million. Howard casts the deciding vote that gives Napleton the $2.4 million.

Where's the U.S. Attorney when we need him?

Anonymous said...

According to the city's website the regularly scheduled meetings of the city council in February are cancelled. What's up with that?

Anonymous said...

If petititions to stagger terms are going to be circulating, please count me in. I've collected signatures before (on the EOP development) with little effect, but maybe this time they will lead to a more positive result.

Anonymous said...

In past efforts, Howard has terrified the citizens of PR with the prospect of an invasion of chicago DEMOCRATS using his enemies as stalking horses. Democrats are the people who appropriat your tax money and waste it on needless social programs, education and poor people. Howard is the person who appropriates your tax money and gives it to car dealers.

Anonymous said...

If the old man ( Mr. napleton ) was alive - you would have paid more !!
Enjoy the ride ......remember
when you turn you cadillac on does it return the favor!
B.O.H.I.C.A.

Anonymous said...

Off Topic -

Closed Executive Session = "Journal Only" press conference.

Anonymous said...

At least Frank W. had the guts to say no.

Anonymous said...

Today's Herald Advocate: "Bach, Allegretti and Ryan did not outline their reasons for supporting the Napleton agreement during the City Council meeting."


Gee maybe take a look who backed them for office.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous January 30, 2008 12:32 PM

Frank Wsol would make a better mayor than Frimark, but that's not saying much. If it wasn't for Friel, Frank wouldn't even be an alderman today. And didn't Frank vote for that Taj Mahal police station we can't afford?

Anonymous said...

Station critics:
You're on the honor system for this...
Without running to Google or a dictionary...please answer...
Taj Mahal is
A)a mausoleum
B)a casino hotel
C)a driver for Park Ridge Taxi
D)all of the above

Anonymous said...

To all my Park Ridge friends...

TOLD YOU SO about that gas bag Frimark.

Shame, shame, shame...

Anonymous said...

I love all the bickering and "I told you so" stuff. It's amusing, yes, and we all get our frustrations out.
We gotta get over that now, and move forward. It's time to get Howard OUT (the election is 14 months away!) and to circulate those petitions to get the issue on the ballot to stagger terms of the city council.

Anonymous said...

ms manchester is right. It is time to get beyond the "I told you so" stage--and no one is more guilty of it than I am.

Probably a good start would be to identify potential candidates for mayor (don't worry: if requested, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve; if indicted, I will not resign). Then we should come together behind a strong candidate. We should also be prepared to lay aside our partisan inclinations (it appears that Howard has detractors among Democrats, Republicans and Independents).

Then we get to pick a name. But only after we have a candidate.

Let the fun begin!

Anonymous said...

OK... I can't not say this.

$2.4 million would go a long way toward cleaning up the figgin' snow. Is PR the worst at snow removal or what???

Anonymous said...

A cynic would say that the money allocated for snow removal is being used to settle lawsuits over police brutality.

Why has PRU not yet commented on the council's vote to bid on a property for the new police station without determining if the site is suitable for a station?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Logic would dictate that the council does believe the site is suitable for a new police station, or they wouldn't have voted to bid on the property, would they?

Could also be that the council doesn't know their butts from brass tacks.

Could also be that Howie's been pushing hard to get the council to go along with this for reasons that remain buried. Maybe in a land trust?

Anonymous said...

It's probably a combination...the council doesn't know what it's doing, and it wouldn't surprise me if Frimark has some beneficial interest in Target Area 4. That man is nothing but a self-interested piece of scum. He doesn't do anything that isn't of benefit to himself or his interests first and foremost.

Anonymous said...

The only strong mayoral candidate is onoe who is willing to step up on his/her own, not one who has to be chosen by a group.

Anonymous said...

Several years ago when Dominick's expanded the store at Cumberland and Higgins, a clean up of the site where the dry cleaning business was had to be completed. Who paid for that clean-up? I do not recall reading that our tax dollars went to clean up the site.

I have enjoyed reading this website for these past several months and am very appreciative of the information and education all the posts contain. Thank you.

But a couple questions-the actions of the mayor and members of our government are so unethical that they cannot possibly be legal. Or do our laws governing the way we govern actually allow for this type of behavior? If it is not legal, then how and when will formal charges be brought against Howard Frimark. Our mayor and his actions, along with the actions of some on the city council, have turned this town into a laughingstock.

Who are the individuals who own PRC-the developer who is buying the Napleton site? If they have millions to buy the site another $400,000 for cleanup seems insignificant.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

To borrow a phrase,

We report. You decide.

The PRU Crew will not do more than inform the people of what we know and hear.

It's time the average citizens in Park Ridge begin taking back control of their government.

Anonymous said...

according to Lisa Madigan's office, they aren't doing anything illegal. Yet. As far as we know...

Anonymous said...

Off Topic here......in thursday's paper we see that it looks like - maybe could be another tax hike!

What is wrong with the police/ff
pension fund ? Is it no fully funded ? Or did they take from Peter and give to Paul - again !

No other town does this - should someone retire - ooops! we ran out of money....lets raise the taxes - again?

I don't understand this - its like give a teenager a credit card here...go and do what you want just don't go over your budget?????????

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

It definitely seems some organization of we like-minded individuals is warranted. I am more and more convinced we are dealing with genuine corruption here...

Enough talk, what can the average citizen do?

Suggestions???

Anonymous said...

Galileo:

What can the average citizen do?

1. Go to meetings. The City Council normally meets on the 1st & 3rd Mondays of the month.

2. Complain to your alderman about all the ways the city is being run wrong (or even compliment him if something is done right, or well). Best to do it by e-mail so that you retain a copy of exactly what you said to him - and if you're lucky, you might even get a written response in return.

3. Write letters to the newspaper to help inform your fellow average citizens.

4. Run for office, or at least encourage someone else you know and trust to to do so.

5. Apply for an appointment to a city board or commission. Most of these are packed with Frimark "yes" men and women, but it never hurts to apply.

6. Help get a petition drive going for a referendum this November to stagger the terms of the Council so that all 7 aldermen do not come up for election at the same time. If at least 3 of the sitting aldermen (Wards 2, 4 and 6?) have to run for re-election in April, that means we will always have some experience/continuity on the Council, rather than the possibility of 7 new faces with no knowledge or experience.