May 19, 2009

Box of Rocks Council Recap!



At last night's City Council meeting, Boy Scout Troop 50 did the honors of the Pledge of Allegiance. Then the Council proceeded through the consent agenda items (.pdf).

Next up, Mayor Schmidtzkrieg read a National Public Works Week proclamation, then he let everyone know the process for selecting his replacement for a 1st ward Alderman is moving right along -- a committee of 1st ward residents will be meeting tonight to discuss the resumes submitted by 4 hopefuls. Mayor Schmidtzkrieg hopes to be able to make a recommendation to the Council on May 28th for Council discussion and questions at the June 1st Council meeting. The PRU Crew is aware of who the 4 hopefuls are, but we would only trade you a cup of warm milk for 2 of them.

Under the portion of the agenda that allows citizens to address the Council on non-agenda items, Ms. Judy Barclay of CURRB repute rose to speak about an upcoming
Kalo Foundation event that will take place at the Park Ridge Public Library on June 16th at 2:00 pm.

Next, Mr. Dave Areen, a resident on the 700 block of North Lincoln Avenue asked about the issue of water runoff from the
Park Ridge Country Club and if the Council would provide regular updates on flooding issues. Mayor Schmidtzkrieg asked that this item be placed on the next Public Works Committee of the Whole agenda for June 8th.

The last citizen to address the Council on a non-agenda item was Mr. George Kirkland of
CORRECTS fame -- George, where have you been hiding for the past two years, man? It seems Mr. Kirkland is now concerned with visibility at intersections and would like to see the City enforce the ordinance governing the limits on height for the growth of bushes and trees. The PRU Crew feels this is a worthy cause and that Mr. Kirkland may find a kindred spirit in the Park Ridge Pedestrian.

The Council then moved on to the Public Works discussion item about the
Forestry Appeal for 932 N. Western Ave. (.pdf) The 2nd ward's Lord of the Manor, Ald. Rich DiPietro, moved the appeal be granted under the conditions that, at the residents' expense, they agree to an inch-for-inch replacement of the tree being removed, and that the City Forester determine the number of trees to be replaced and the location of the trees in the community.

The 5th ward's Benedict Ald. Robert Ryan asked Public Works Director Wayne Zingsheim whether this would be "an issue of setting precedent" and whether it is "good or reasonable to set this public policy?" Public Work's Director Wayne Zingsheim answered that
city staff "follows the rule of law" and that public policy is "up to the Council." And we see once again that Benedict Ryan doesn't know his representative policy-making ass from an unfilled pothole in the ground. Despite what should have been a clear and unequivocal explanation of the respective roles Aldermen and city staff play in municipal government, Benedict Ryan pressed on by then asking Zingsheim if this was a "best practice?" Zingsheim then offered that, "You can't replace a healthy tree of this size."

The 6th ward's Unfriendly Ghost, Ald. Tom Carey, then sought to cover his impending "yes" vote by reiterating that he is "under the impression this is a safety issue" and that he "supports [the removal of this tree] as a safety issue." Seriously. You can never be too careful when it comes to
killer trees -- we bet people thought they were safe taking an after dinner stroll through their neighborhoods, but NO! Beware the killer trees!

Alderman and attorney James Allegretti (4th ward) offered that he's "not concerned with precedent" and that he's "a little bothered by an inch-for-inch replacement requirement." The PRU Crew is wondering if Ald. Allspaghetti has ever used legal precedent in his practice of law?

After further discussion about a Tree Ordinance Task Force, not yet in place, the Council voted 5 (DiPietro, Bach, Allegretti, Carey and Wsol) to 1 (Ryan) to approve the removal of this tree on the private property at 932 N. Western Ave.

The next discussion item on the Council agenda was the Finance and Budget Committees increases for the water rates and sewer fees.

On the issue of the water rates, Mr. Kirkland again addressed the Council suggesting that it is a more prudent fiscal practice to pass on the 15% increase in the cost of water to residents. Alderman Don Bachtard again stated his belief that the "City Manager hasn't done his due diligence" and that there are "other ways to make up for the budget shortfalls" and that there are some city departments that have "fewer than 10 people managed by a few managers." The PRU Crew wonders if Bachtard has bothered to consider individual function while he concerns himself with the size of city departments.

Mayor Schmidtzkrieg once again stated that the "City can't afford to absorb" these increases and that he would "love to see an Alderman amend this motion to increase the water rate to 15%" because the Aldermen are "making the [budget] problem worse."

No amendment was forthcoming.

The Council then voted 4 (Allegretti, Ryan, Carey, and DiPietro) to 2 (Bach and Wsol) to increase water rates by 5%. The estimated annual cost to the average Park Ridge household is $20.00

The Council then moved on to the establishment of a sewer enterprise fund. Alderman Allspaghetti said that "Park Ridge is an older suburb with a combined sewer system" and that he hopes this "fund will allow us to begin to set aside money and begin to have a separate system." Allspaghetti also offered that he believes the sewer enterprise fund was "originally Alderman Wsol's idea." Wrong-o Jimbo -- Ald. Wsooooolman has never had an original fiscally conservative idea during his entire term on the Council, but we expect that if, more likely when, Wsooooolman announces his intention to run for Mayor, you'll be behind him all the way.

The Aldermen voted 5 (Allegretti, Ryan, Carey, Wsol, and DiPietro) to 1 (Bach) to establish a sewer enterprise fund. The estimated annual cost to the average Park Ridge household is $40.00

Then it was on to the PRU Crews favoritest subject of all --
contributions to community groups (.pdf). Procedures and Regulations Committee chairman Ald. DiPietro asked Ald. Wsol to motion the matter for debate and approval.

For those readers who may not be aware, according to Roberts Rules of Order, it is a committee chairman who usually motions an item for debate and approval, unless he disagrees with the motion. The reason being, also according to Roberts Rules of Order, all motions are to be made in the affirmative. In other words, a motion is never made thusly -- "I move taxpayers not be allowed to take the Aldermorons out back to the woodshed and beat some sense into them."

The Lord of the Manor went on to explain that he is "concerned with going over budget" and that he believes there is "no question each group deserves and need these funds." DiPietro also went on to express that "residents have been told things like alley paving has to be put on hold and city staff has also been asked to pitch in" and further that telling residents and staff these things and then going over budget isn't wise.

Benedict Ryan said that "We've voted twice on this," proving yet again that Benedict Ryan doesn't get how government works, procedurally. Benedict Ryan also stated again, more specifically this time, that for "every $1 we give we get $20 in return" and that these groups "fulfill what government would normally do."

~~ If you'll excuse the Crew for a moment, we need to catch our breath and wipe the vomit from our mouths -- we thank you for your patience. ~~

We're not sure about what most other people believe, but the PRU Crew is certain that it has never been the intended role of city government to provide a Fine Arts Society, Civic Orchestra, Teen (recreation) Center, Youth (activities) Commission, Senior (recreation) Center, Historical Society, Cultural Arts Council, Kalo Foundation, Brickton Arts Center, Taxi Subsidies, or worthless noise monitors under the flagrantly fraudulent moniker of "Noise Abatement." But maybe that's just us, and we willingly admit we're curmudgeons about these sorts of things.

Despite the fact that only 5 of the 16 (do your own math!) community groups receiving funding have anything to do with "human needs", like food and shelter, the Aldermen vehemently discussed the necessity of funding for "human needs" and not once mentioned human hobbies.

Three residents rose to address the Council on this issue -- Mr. Mike Cavallo, Mr. Lloyd Godfrey and Ms. Bridgette Murphy -- and encouraged the Aldermen to reconsider these expenditures and stay within the budget.

Ms. Mary Shurder, Executive Director for the Center of Concern addressed the Council and let them know that the Board of Directors was aware of the City's budget issues and the alternative plan -- the one within the budget -- previously offered, and were "happy with that" but that the "need isn't going away."

The box of rocks, otherwise known as our very own City Council, even ignored the message implied in Ms. Shurder's address and carried on their lamentations of the "human needs" within Park Ridge.

Finally, Mayor Schmidtzkrieg said that he was the one who took this item off the City Council's consent agenda so that they could discuss this matter "one more time." Mayor Schmidtzkrieg went on to say, "The issue is, does the City have room for this increase and the answer is an emphatic no."

With that the Council voted 5 (Ryan, Carey, Wsol, Bach, and Allegretti) to 1 (DiPietro) to increase funding for community groups in an over-budget amount of $38,900.

Under new business, Ald. Bachtard said he hoped people would express their appreciation for our Police and Fire department personnel, in light of the two recent accidents that took place in town -- one of which cost one of his constituents his life.

In a more light-hearted moment of new business, Ald. Carey said the Youth Commission is undertaking its first fundraiser in an effort to provide self-support of its group. Ald. Carey stressed that, despite the number of Cubs fans in town, the Youth Commission will be holding a Sox Night on July 8th, and he hoped people would come out and support it. Mayor Schmidtzkrieg inquired if the reason the Youth Commission was holding a Sox Night was because "Sox tickets are easier to get than Cubs tickets?" Ald. Carey laughingly declined to answer.

With that, the Council adjourned the meeting.

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

So the box of rocks goes over the proposed budget, says thank you for your help to the police and fire guys and still wants to lay off City personnel?

BOHICA

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@3:05 --

By jove, you've got it!

Hey, you could be an Alderman!

Anonymous said...

We sure do have a budget problem, and I call it the Aldermen!

Let's assume that Bach even has one brain cell in his jar head and that the budget mess would improve if city staff were laid off.

The budget deficit is 2 mil. dollars.

How many city employees would we have to lay off to get rid of the deficit?

I read here that if the employees agreed to salary freezes the budget hole could be less by 800 thousand dollars.

What about ther rest of the 1 mil. dollar deficit?

How many city employees would we have to lay off to get rid of that deficit? How much do these managers make? Even if all of them make 100 thou. per year that would be 10 managers to make that 1 mil. hole go away.

This sounds absurd to me.

I am starting to think Bach has a bug up his rear about one or some city employees in particular and his wanting to get rid of them doesn't have all that much to do with the city budget.

Anonymous said...

Bach is an imbecile like Allegretti and Ryan.

The one I don't get is Wsol. This guy has completely jumped the shark.

Anonymous said...

HMM, I'm not sure what "jump the shark" means...but I thought Wsol's speech was ridiculous grand standing about NOTHING. He's like the next Blago! Wsol as Mayor!! Wow, I really hope not!

I also got the impression Bach has VERY specific people in mind. With his tone it's almost like he was threatening to go public with it. What could it be? Is there ghost payroll in Park Ridge? Or is he making something out of nothing to look relevant?

Bean said...

"Jump the shark" is a reference to when a television series goes off in some bizarre direction. It comes from the Happy Days show when Fonzie jumped a shark while on water skis...wholly out of character.

...and I agree...Wsol appears to have completely "jumped the shark" regarding fiscal responsibility.

Anonymous said...

Your petty little soap opera bores me.

Anonymous said...

I think you all have "jumped the shark" on saying " jump the shark" in reference to some meaningless alderman in a tiny two bit town.

Anonymous said...

Don't read the blog if you are bored and none of this matters to you. DUH!!!

I happen to care what our city is doing with my tax money and I say thank you to the PRU Crew again for keeping us informed.

gypsy said...

oh my oh my oh my...
Jumpin the Shark?!

I
LOVE
IT!

here you go (keyword="desperate"):
Jumping the shark is a colloquialism coined by Jon Hein and used by TV critics and fans to denote the point in a TV show or movie series' history where the plot veers off into absurd story lines or out-of-the-ordinary characterizations. This usually corresponds to the point where a show with falling ratings apparently becomes more desperate to draw viewers in. In the process of undergoing these changes, the TV or movie series loses its original appeal. Shows that have "jumped the shark" are typically deemed to have passed their peak.

gypsy said...

3:53 anon---is that you Mr. Allegretti?!!! or Carey?
Bored AGAIN, dearies?

Bean said...

Actually, Park Ridge is considered one of the smaller bigger cities in Illinois...those with populations over 6000.

Municipalities with less than 1000 residents are considered "very small"...even "tiny"...

...but perhaps, Anonymous at 355, you've "jumped the shark" when it comes to discussing these issues.

pppppfffffttttt!

I thought Anonymous at 329 was spot on in characterizing Alderman Wsol's...heh..."leaving the reservation" of fiscal responsibility regarding the city budget.

pppppfffffttttt somemore!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, that's right you stupid jerk! Stay out of OUR business! Go jump into a tank of sharks and get a life.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@4:23 --

"Go jump into a tank of sharks and get a life" strikes us as mutually exclusive.

Just sayin'.

Anonymous said...

Nice wikipedia work you brainless Gypsy. Next time note your sources or we will not see through you and assume you are a genius.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@4:26 --

Have you got anything to say about the topic of today's post? Or are you still looking for an open bar, and have you stopped beating your wife?

gypsy said...

sorry, I didn't know this was a term paper and I had to list my sources.

Thanks for showing your true colors and stupidity. Too bad you stick to things other than the issues. YOU are part of the problem.

Anonymous said...

Get ready everyone, with the cuts in city staff (police, fire, and public works) these aldermen want to do, I hope everyone is very experienced in performing these occupations. Sorry Mrs. Smith, but since we lost 5 police officers we have no one available to help with someone breaking into your house. Do you own a firearm to defend yourself until someone can get there? Hello Mr. Adams, sorry we only have one snow plow to cover the city with the foot of snow we got. Do you have a snowblower or a plow on the front of you car or truck that you can use to help out? Oh Mr. Brown you house is on fire, I sorry but with the cuts in fire dept. staff no one is available. Can you use your garden hose until someone in available to respond? I understand Mrs. Wright that you husband is having a heart attack, but with cuts in manning, no one is available to help right now. Do you possibly own your own AED to help your husband?
Nice to seen that the aldermonkeys want to keep funding ($40,000 over budget)all of these civic groups with all this extra money that the city has and can care less about us, the citizens!!
Lets get rid of the people working and protecting all of us. Really smart you idiots!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry I asked about jumping the shark. Oddly, it's angered people more than the ridiculous vote to continue to fund community programs. Since that's bringing everyone together, let's all wear shark hats to the next cc meeting!

Anonymous said...

PRU, thanks for the meeting recap. When is the next round of elections for Aldermen?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@4:50 --

The next Council elections will take place in April of 2011.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, the aldermonkeys are idiots! I bet they will never get heart attacks and have to wait for the police to show up or set their house on fire! Theyr all a bunch of moroons and got to go!

Jaws said...

Do you know that sharks eat monkeys? Aldermonkeys that is.

Dunk tank at taste of Uptown anyone?

Arthur said...

It's true! It's true! The crown has made it clear. The climate must be perfect all the year.

A law was made a distant moon ago here. July and August cannot be too hot. And there's a legal limit to the snow here In Camelot.

The winter is forbidden till December And exits March the second on the dot.

By order, summer lingers through September In Camelot.
Camelot! Camelot!

I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That's how conditions are.

The rain may never fall till after sundown. By eight, the morning fog must disappear.

In short, there's simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.

Camelot! Camelot!
I know it gives a person pause,
But in Camelot, Camelot
Those are the legal laws.

The snow may never slush upon the hillside. By nine p.m. the moonlight must appear.

In short, there's simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.

Anonymous said...

Art... like Bach you are an idiot.

PRU... your post today is an insult to a box of rocks.

Anonymous said...

Funny, but I'd bet that if PRU came up with it, freezing raises to save $800,000 on a $2 million deficit would look pretty worthwhile. What's wrong with that? Nobody's talking about cutting police, fire or public works except those who are panic-mongering for their own gain. That heinous $38K could be found in a heartbeat or the departure of one sullen clerical. C'mon! Richer towns than ours are actually laying off staff; a pay freeze during a protracted international recession wouldn't kill anyone. They've still got their fab affordable health care, defined-benefit pensions and decent existing salaries. Do you? Media are reporting that customer service levels everywhere are improving because everyone is trying to demonstrate his/her worthiness of being retained on staff. If even the possibility existed in our local governments, the problem would be......?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@11:28 --

We don't believe we've express any determined opposition to the possibility of a salary freeze -- especially if such a freeze would retain staff.

As for the rest of your comment about what other towns are doing, we don't think copying off of Benedict Alderman Ryan is the way to go.

Anonymous said...

Hang in there voters!

Keep'em legal as they say.

Ald. Don B. would be the first
to jump overboard if the ship
was sinking. But asking why all the way down is his MO.

Grand standing...I agree too.

Let's stick to the gig Joe bob!

The budget and more cuts.

How many bites at the apple can City Mgr Jim H. have here.

Sharpen that pencil Jim.
Yes - that no 2 that Howie gave you
with the big eraiser.....

Anonymous said...

If the budget is slim, why are we all expected to shell out more money for flood control? Let 'em chip in and pay their own way out of living on a flood plain.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@12:08 --

Yours is not an unreasonable question, however the answer to it is that not all the flooding problems are an issue of living on a flood plain. Much of the issue has to do with sewer system backups and the system design, which we believe is an issue and responsibility for the entire community.

Anonymous said...

I agree that flooding needs to be addressed. If the current sewer system in unable to take in those 3-4 inches of rain spells that we get then we need to update the system.

If the residents are getting hit in their homes too - then its another issue.

Those with the old fashion gravity system(s) should look into overhead systems - if you are in that bad of shape.

I agree with the city engineer(s) in prevention with their statements to turn the water away
from the home.

Flooding is a key issue but so is the poison in the air that we breathe from the low flying jet aircraft.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I know I'm going to get beat up for this but...

Did any of us really think that living "convieniently close" to O'Hare meant NEVER having planes fly over our houses? I hate to tell ya but those poisons you are speaking of have been dropped over our community since the airport was built. And with prevailing winds just because at one time a runway was located somewhere other than over your house, the "poisons" probably at one time or another blew in your gerneral direction.

Quite frankly I haven't seen any longtime P.R. residents with any kind of mutant deformity due to the airplanes.

Hoover said...

The difference between flooding and O'Hare is that we actually control our own destiny with flooding (subject only to Mother Nature) but with O'Hare we're just one little cog in the national/international air traffic system.

I don't like airplane noise or pollution any more than the next guy, but it's time for people to either put up or shut up on anti-O'Hare stuff. If you can't come up with the "silver bullet" that can win the O'Hare argument and a written legal opinion from a competent attorney saying that the bullet, how it will work, and how much will it cost, then shut up and walk away.

In case you haven't noticed, even SOC has closed its doors after spending millions and getting nowhere. O'Hare has been and continues to be a black hole for money, time and effort spent fighting it.

Let's put that money, time and effort into something that we can actually succeed with: Flooding.

Anonymous said...

Hoover:

We do not know if we can "succeed" with the flood issue. We do not even have a agreed upon definition of what success is on this issue. If success means that there is no flooding during a storm like we had in Sept it will never happen.

There is no plan or at least one that I have seen. Can they tell me by ward what areas flood and why(sewer back up, land water, run off from the country club, basement garages, etc)? Can they tell me exactly what flooding issues we are responsible for? Where do we start? What do we get for our money....etc....etc. Can they tell me how they plan to fix these issues and what is their confidence level that it will work? Can they tell me how other communities affect our flooding? All this information and more should have been published in a Plan Document for all to see and comment on.

We have no idea if we can be "successful" with the flooding issue.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 3:52 PM:

I understood Hoover's comment as not being whether we could completely prevent or eliminate flooding in Park Ridge homes, but that we could decide what and how much we could do to combat the problem. That is unlike O'Hare, where we would be battling the City of Chicago, the FAA, the airlines and maybe even the U.S. Congress.

And I agree with Hoover that if SOC could not win after spending millions over years and years - before the new runway and control tower were built for $1/2 BILLION DOLLARS, then there's no chance in the world that we're going to shut it down or get significant changes, especially if we don't even have our own senators and congresswoman in our corner.

Anonymous said...

Dear 3:52
Ah, there is the rub! Getting the attention of our senators and reps. is the job at hand. I object to helping with flooding because those of us plagued by planes have had little to none in the way of help. It has been "too bad for you". We are not asking for money.......letters, calls, e-mails, and showing up at meetings to offer support would be appreciated. Let the senators and reps. KNOW IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that thier jobs are in jeopardy. When that happens I would be a bit more sympathetic about the flooding issue. YOU KNOW.....WORKING TOGETHER AS A UNIFIED BODY!!!!!!! What a NOVEL idea.

Anonymous said...

Anon@1205:

Part of the reason that you are getting told "too bad for you" is that many of you "plagued by planes" cry of "poison in the air we breathe", the sky is potentially falling on our school, it's not if but when distaster will strike, I have yellow snow in my yard, I smell funny smells, I cant enjoy my outdoor living, etc., etc. while saying we should "work together as a unified body" and in the same breath tell your neighbors just across town who for years had the same "conditions" (and still do when you don't) "hey neighbor...too bad for you, you knew what you were getting into when you bought your house"

What some people are hearing is:Let's be unified...NOW that it affects me!!!

Oh and WHEN I get my way THEN you'll "be sympathetic" to flooding??? Gee thanks...sounds really unified... Does the term "fair weather friend" ring a bell...? How about the phrase "now that the shoe is on the other foot"?

and dont get me wrong cuz i havent been overly affected by flooding...Im not sold on all the flood plans either...Im concerned but I dont think we should be publicly funding ALL that I have heard on the flooding issue...

Lastly, I thought I remembered a discussion about possibly funding (with public money) a local group who shared your airport concerns... Maybe they didnt ASK for the money but someone sure brought it up...

But yes, call/write/email your elected representatives about your concerns! Just dont expect blind support from those who dont share your concerns.

Anonymous said...

looking back to January, it may have been ORD-REST I was thinking of, to the tune of $300k...