May 5, 2010

Freshman Year Is Over!



One year ago, Mayor Dave Schmidtkrieg took the oath of office and was seated as the freshman Mayor of Park Ridge, IL. And now Mayor Schmidtzkrieg's freshman year is over -- time for final grades!

Math Skills -- C

We had hoped your final budget veto exam would have produced a better final grade. But your math is a bit fuzzy, you failed to show your work, and you failed to complete some equations. We understand why you chose to estimate next year's budget projections based upon last year's budget projections, but we feel you could have done a much better job of formulating your answers.

We also found your class participation, over the ten session budget course you signed up for, rather disappointing. We note the rules of participation for the Mayor's engagement in discussion and debate were changed during your tenure as an Alderman -- while the Council has failed to follow the rules it voted to institute, consistent practice has allowed the Mayor to engage in discussion and debate to the heart's content, and you have not taken advantage of the opportunity.

One of your best attempts at problem solving occurred when you undertook to formulate a workable solution to the water fund deficit -- however, your budget veto address seemed to call into question, if not contradict, your own calculations about the projections of the water fund balance.

Your other best attempt at problem solving was your overall, general attempt to work with positive numbers. Calling for a balanced budget -- a correction to your two previous year's work as an Alderman engaged in the manipulation of negative numbers -- was an excellent effort which has some potential to produce the only balanced city budget in the black since the Spring of 2006-2007, right before you were seated as an Alderman.

Language Arts -- D

You began the year with a strong showing -- the PRU Crew appreciated many of your well-worded press releases and emails to supporters. However, over the last half of the year, you seemed to become distracted and your dissertations on issues seemed rushed, shallow, and plaintive. You failed to properly correct misinformation in the public domain and you failed to properly elucidate the fine points of issues and your positions. Additionally, while we don't have access to your fraternity's files, we believe the work you've submitted for review is not necessarily your own.

Your lack of communication and attention to the commissions and task forces you created left a vacuum of balancing opinion and thought and now you are faced with both policy and political problems which will undermine your good government agenda and goals. The PROAC and Flood Control Task Force, both of which you created and populated with your appointees, are prime examples of bodies with which you have failed to adequately communicate through attendance and participation at their open forums.

We're not fans of social media such as Face Book, but we understand there are plenty of people who are -- and you are one of them. We understand your desire to reach out in an informal way to supporters and friends. However, if you are using your Face Book account for the creation and maintenance of personal friendships we strongly suggest you remove your personal Face Book account from your official campaign/Mayoral website. Or if you are using your Face Book account for political promotion, and we believe you are since it was originally created and placed on your electdaveschmidt.com website, then we strongly urge you not to limit access to readers. We note, as far as we know and have found through a cursory search, you are the only politician with a Face Book account who does not provide unfettered access to constituent readers.

We strongly encourage you to refrain from any and all discussion of city business on any social media account you may hold -- and when anyone, especially one of your task force appointees, on your friends list (Dick Barton? Chris Provenzano? Seriously?) attempts to open up such a discussion you immediately nip it in the bud and removing the comment would be advisable.

Science -- D

Leadership is not only an art, it's also a science. A leader must understand the way in which instruments can be used and the correct scientific method for their use. We find your employment of the instruments at your disposal, and the methods you use, to be rather lacking.

The biggest test you faced as a leader was when you tried to use the ethics ordinance instrument at your disposal. Your method of employing this instrument and the way in which you treated this instrument earned you a failing grade on one of the biggest tests any leader can face -- choosing enforcement of the law and prosecution of a wrong above any other consideration. The wasted time, energy, and resources was nothing less than gross mismanagement and manipulation of the instruments at your disposal.

What has kept you from earning a total failing grade in this subject area is the leadership effort you've made in the subject area of math -- taking responsibility to course-correct past errors in the overall, general approach you've taken on seeking a balanced budget.

Social Studies - F

Where to begin?

During your freshman year as Mayor, you demonstrated far too much fraternity and far too little egalite.

Your refusal to consider your own campaign rhetoric in the area of social needs services, your failure to demand evidence of the accusations being made about certain community groups, and your equivocating position on special event cost reviews leave us scratching our heads.

We find your lack of demand for total accountability from each of the community groups and private organizations which have come under scrutiny to be a failing of one of your most foundational campaign positions -- transparency. We're also very well aware of your failure to provide total transparency in other areas of public policy consideration, but those assignments remain incomplete, so we have not factored them into your grade.

Your seeming abandonment of your campaign rhetoric about preserving Park Ridge as a bedroom community in light of your silence on the newest liquor license is strange. We understand Mr. Ed Berry was one of your campaign contributors, and that you consider him and Mr. Declan Stapleton to be your friends, and so you disclosed the economic relationship and recused yourself from the public discussions. However, we believe you should also understand that disclosure does not require recusal from discussion. We believe you chose recusal on the subject as a way of providing yourself with political cover. We are not opposed to changes in the environment of Park Ridge, especially if a seeming majority of residents favor some changes, but we aren't willing to accept a representative's silence on any subject under the guise of ethical conduct when we strongly suspect political expediency as the motivation.

Finally, in the subject area of social studies -- lay off the goddamn beer. And for added strength of character, you may want to review a recent court settlement from Des Plaines -- and we don't mean the billboard case.

Your final average grade for your freshman year as the Mayor of Park Ridge, IL. is a D. You have not met your potential. We hope for a better showing during your sophomore year -- try not to be sophomoric about it.

40 comments:

Anonymous said...

It’s all a matter of perspective isn’t it? The kid who has been failing math all year and then pulls a D out in the end has reason to celebrate. His GPA sucks, but he got his credit hours and he is one year closer to the diploma.

Anonymous said...

No grade inflation here! Pru, you're a tough grader!

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@11:44 --

Not everybody's awesome.

Anonymous said...

I never thought our mayor was awesome only a better choice than the last one.

Anonymous said...

Ouch.

Anonymous said...

"We believe you chose recusal on the subject as a way of providing yourself with political cover".

It seems to me this also applies to the current budget discussions. His e-mail to supporters (I thought he was also the mayor for those who did not support him) hammers the budget with no new ideas about what he would cut with the exception of community groups and O'hare. His suggestions do not match hos "dooms-day" e-mail. He would clearly rather sit back and criticize without being on the hook for anything. That is a pattern.

Anonymous said...

Is there anyone happy with Schmidt?

Anonymous said...

2:40:

I would say the Public Watchdog is happy with Schmidt.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@3:19 --

That didn't take long.

We figured someone was going to grab that low hanging fruit sooner or later.

Anonymous said...

1:55 PM:

Schmidt's got veto power, nothing more. And it's not his job to re-do the budget, it's the Council's and Hock's. But if the five votes that passed the budget hold firm, they can over-ride Schmidt and that's that.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@3:20 --

We must have missed the press release and email to supporters about Schmidt's sudden case of laryngitis.

Anonymous said...

LOL. Pru, you nailed it. Schmidt had less power as a lowly alderman but he never missed a chance to criticize the last mayor or say what he thought the aldermen should do. He sure has done a 180.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@3:31--3:40 --

A little patience goes a long way. Our apologies for not publishing your comment more quickly.

Do you have a preference for which one you prefer? We're willing to leave both or delete one or the other.

Anonymous said...

LOL. You can delete the first one with the typo. Thanx.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

You're welcome.

Anonymous said...

If Mayor Dave has laryngitis I will have to see a doctor's note before his absence is excused.

Anonymous said...

3:20:

Based on your thoery we all should have loved Frimark. After all, he had no power, he was just the Mayor.

3:19:

You better watch what you say. You do not want to be labeled a "whiner". Considering the Mayor and PD seem to be clones, I wonder if that means the Mayor thinks those who question his performance are whiners.

Bean said...

Nah...DipSchmidt won't call you a "whiner" if you "question his performance"...

But he will call you ornery, gutless, and a pussy...probably because you called him an "F-ing fool in shoes..."

...and then you'll have to point out that it's better to *have* a pussy than BE a pussy...

...and then he'll thank you for writing.

Anonymous said...

Gees Bean,

Don't hold back, tell us what you really feel.

;~) you are a shy one, you should come out of your shell a little!;~)

Bean said...

Anonymous @ 4:38,

I get that a lot.

Anonymous said...

Holy mackrel!

I remember Mayor Schmidt saying he would veto a budget that was not balanced. I read in the papers the budget is balanced but Mayor Schmidt disagrees it is. I think it all depends on what happens with Governor Quin's proposal to hold back income taxes.

The grades the PRU gives the Mayor maybe are a little low but I agree there is much room for improvement in Mayor Schmidts leadership.

Anonymous said...

4:24:

Clones, twins or a ventriloquist act.

I'm undecided.

Anonymous said...

Our police, fire, and public workers are already gone. I don't care what Schmidt does now. I will never give him my vote again. He has betrayed this town. I give him an F!!!!!!!!!

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Mr. Mayor --

Excellent choice on removing the Face Book link from your official mayoral website.

Anonymous said...

LOL. Instead of being open and transparent and letting anyone read his Face Book page Schmidt took the link off his mayoral website? That is hysterical!

Anonymous said...

When I first came to the blogs as a new PR resident, I was amazed at all the attention given to Frimark and his meetings over coffee.

Welcome to the new technological world!! Rather than coffee, todays "insiders" get to use Social Networks and e-mails. I guess there is transparency and there is transparency!!!!

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@8:01 --

It is a new technological age and former Mayor Howard was uncomfortable putting anything in writing that couldn't be shredded and--or denied.

He may also not have known how to use a computer.

Anonymous said...

Some thoughts:

1) Schmidt has under achieved

2) Grades are tough but not unrealistic

3) There is always next year

Anonymous said...

11:51 AM

1. Probably true, although I cannot think of one thing that he could have done on his own, without the cooperation of a majority of sitting aldermen who all supported and contributed to the campaigns of Schmidt's opponent.

2. Being the first mayor to veto anything (over-budget contributions last year, an entire budget this year) and opening up the budget process to the public for the first time, should have raised at least the F and D grades a notch irrespective of the artificial "courses" set up by the clip art.

3. If by "next year" you mean the aldermanic elections, yes there is. But the last time aldermen were elected there were no contested races in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd wards. In fact, there hasn't been a contested race in the 2nd ward since 2003, or one in the 3rd ward in at least 13 years.

Anonymous said...

PRU:

My hunch is that those same kinds of undocumented conversations you reference, involving a very select group of supporters, take place today as well.

To quote your excellent review from yesterday....." Additionally, while we don't have access to your fraternity's files, we believe the work you've submitted for review is not necessarily your own".

Anonymous said...

12:28: Opening up the budget process to the public is a major achievement? When Schmidt ran he ran saying open goverment. The open budget process did us no good so big deal. Get real.

Anonymous said...

Little high and mighty today PRU?

It's good that we feel good about ourselves, but take it easy. You and the usual suspects here seem to be fairly well secure in your glass houses.

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:20

Are you one of the clones, a twin, a ventriloquist, or a dummy?

Anonymous said...

"There's battle lines being drawn. Nobody's right if everybody's wrong."

I love it when the blogs turn on each other! PubDog and PRU are actually calling each other out on being fronts masquerading as grassroots movements for politicians.

Meanwhile behind all the poloticking there is a real budget that needs balancing.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@6:01 --

We're pretty sure it took more votes than the PRU Crews' to elect Dave Schmidt, so we're going to continue to believe a grassroots effort of interested citizens accomplished that task.

If you've noted a difference between the blogs it may be you've noticed we aren't willing to make excuses for the Mayor's missteps and--or double talk.

Anonymous said...

True, and I do appreciate PRU calling the mayor out on some of his shortcomings in this very post. I also appreciate you calling out PubDog for being a "clone, twin or vertriloquist" of the mayor.

It was Anon @ 3:20 who replied that you "lived in glass houses", which I interpreted to mean that he claimed that this blog is a mouthpiece for some politician(s) or candidate(s).

I don't know if it is or isn't. Ironically the anonymity on both these blogs allows for people to forward political agendas without the reader being able to discover an hidden motivations, which is the exact reason there are so many calls for transparency on these blogs.

And before I get called anti-Schmidt myself, I actually agree that budget could have been handled better by the manager and council. It needs more work. I just think the mayor prefers grandstanding to make a political point, probably in an effort to forward some agreeable aldermanic candidates, to rolling up his sleeves and doing his best to provide input even against the opposition of the council. He should have submitted his best effort at a balanced budget. Had he done that we all would have been able to determine the problems and where all our politicians stand on all issues, and his grades would have been better here.

PRU.ADMIN said...

Anon@6:48 --

Thank you for the compliment and approval. But we're certain 3:20 is not an official member of the Pub-dog pack. And the response did not come from an offical member of the Crew either.

We do believe we've always been very clear about our political agenda but if you need a refresher, please read our very first post and our New Years posts.

Your final paragraph is sage.

Enjoy the rest of your evening.

Anonymous said...

6:48:

While I am not fond of much that this current crop of Aldermen has done (let's not forget that includes Alderman Dave), I am starting to get this slightly uneasy feeling in the pit of my stomach about what Schmidt might do if he had the votes in the council. I mean I think it is possible to want the city to be fiscally responsible and yet also support an organization like CoC.

Anonymous said...

PRU - It must be nice to be certain about who is posting here, and their affilitaions. I did read your posts, I am clear about your political agenda, and I agree with most of it. Some is a bit too mean spirited for civil discourse and productive debate, most is damn entertaining.

The only problem I have is that without knowing who you or the other posters are, no one can be certain if there are other motivations than what is being said directly. For all I know you are Don Bach's brother (doubt it), and PubDog is headed by Schmidt's best friend (could be).

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@11:19 --

In some instances we are certain who a poster is not -- in other instances we are certain who a poster is, usually due to their clicking in through their business server.

We get a chuckle out of how many people are not putting in the hours and hours directly performing their jobs that they say they are.

Our blog is intended for adults, even though far too many act like children. If you find what we say mean spirited we suggest you make the choice for yourself to continue reading here or not.

If you find yourself more often entertained than irritated, and you make the choice to keep reading here, you'll have to learn to live with the times you find the conversation displeasing to you.

We would suggest you give careful consideration to exactly what it is you may find displeasing.

We will allow that there are some times when public policy issues are discussed by posters here without the real motivations being revealed. However, we believe the sun always rises and when other motivations come to light, people can then reassess an issue and reformulate their opinions if necessary.

Our political agenda and motivations remain unchanged as we have directly stated them. For those who find they can't measure the value of a direct message without considering the messenger, we suggest they have a long way to go on the intellectual road stretched out before them.

Because we are often enough aware of who is commenting, we are continually laughing at who is agreeing with whom and who is disagreeing with whom. We find the anonymity of comments both entertaining and enlightening.

We understand we have an advantage in our knowledge, but we urge anyone who is so inclined to open a blogger account, research issues, write articles for public consumption, install a visitor meter and enjoy the show.

We give you our anonymous word, and leave the value of it to your determination, the PRU Crew has no relation to Ald. Bach.

We can't nor will we answer for the Pub-dogs.