May 20, 2008

A Quickie Council Recap!



Unlike James Patterson's 384 pages of 'The Quickie', ours is going to be much shorter.

In yesterday's post,
Busy Bees!, we highlighted six items of interest on the City Council agenda that we hoped would get attention from the Park Ridge populace. We hear some items drew a lot of attention, while other items were referred to committees or ignored entirely.

Below is our quickie recap of those six agenda items:

1) A City Council
discussion of off street parking (.pdf) for a property at 14 Main St. -- this item is on the agenda at the request of Benedict Alderman Robert Ryan (5th Ward); it seems Ald. Ryan is always eager to see to it the Real Estate company of his campaign treasurer, Owen Hayes, gets plenty of special attention.

While Benedict Alderman Robert Ryan (5th Ward) attempted, weakly, to speak in general terms about the zoning code requirements and process for requesting a zoning code variance for properties that remain vacant for 180 days or more, it was fairly clear to those present and familiar with Ald. Ryan's nonsense that his goal was to provide assistance to a particular property,
14 Main Street, that just happens to be a commercial property listing out of the McClennan Real Estate office; the same real estate office from which Ald. Ryan's campaign manager, Owen Hayes, operates. Mr. Hayes also has a listing, 104 Main Street, which is said to have off street parking issues as well.

The issue of the City's zoning code requirements for off street parking was referred to committee for review.

2) Under the City Manager's report, a discussion of the
proposed extension of Cumberland Ave. (.pdf) under the train tracks; this isn't the worst idea we've heard come out of City government, but couple it further with a proposal to close Greenwood at the train tracks, and it becomes perhaps the most boneheaded proposal we've heard come out of City government.

Alderman Dave Schmidt (1st Ward) offered that he could immediately save the City the cost of consulting fees by letting everyone know that the idea of extending Cumberland Ave. under the train tracks and then closing Greenwood at the tracks was considered insanity by everyone he's heard from on this issue. Several residents also addressed the Council and expressed their displeasure with this idea.

However, our sources tell us this item provided the highlight of the evening when those in attendance were given a glimpse into the void, otherwise known as the mind of Mayor Howard Frimark. Mayor Howard let everyone know that the money spent to study the extension of Cumberland Ave. is not "our money" but rather it is "Federal money". The PRU Crew isn't sure about Mayor Howard, but Crew members recall recently reviewing some very large amounts of "our money" going into the Federal coffers.

Mayor Howard's mindset reminded us of the
District 64 School Board thinking on money matters related to the City's offer to buy their district headquarters building.

Mayor Howard also let everyone know that he is unfamiliar with the area North of the train tracks because during the 30 years he's lived in Park Ridge he "doesn't go that way".

3) Also under the City Manager's report we see that an amendment to the separation agreement with former Chief of Police, Jeff Caudill, is up for discussion. We're going to bet this has something to do with the Pension Board's denial of a portion of the compensation package Caudill received.

A motion was made to set aside this issue until Ekl Williams could confirm for the City that former Chief Caudill had cooperated with the internal investigation of the police department. Ald. Ryan offered that doing such a thing seemed like "negotiating after the fact." Ald. Schmidt offered his agreement and this matter was referred to the Finance and Budget committee for number crunching.

4) Under Planning and Zoning is a first reading of the rather extensive changes to the year-old zoning ordinance that includes language we believe allows for more development of
R-5 projects (.pdf); the densest and tallest residential projects that can be built. We're also wondering how much the City has paid out in consulting fees on the zoning re-write and why these changes weren't recommended or corrected by the consultant during the re-write process.

This item was referred to committee for discussion of language concerning the B-4 area of the central business district; the hope is to determine language that would define the B-4 business district as a geographic area, then assign the R-5 zoning code to that area.

This item was also referred to committee to determine whether it is the City Council or the Planning and Zoning commission that has the authority to determine procedures and policies. The PRU Crew feels elected officials on the City Council should determine procedures and policies, but we know there are commissions out there that would prefer to operate freely and not be subject to the scrutiny of elected officials.

5) Under the Procedures and Regulations Committee report, the City Council is set to give a first reading to a
new ordinance (.pdf) allowing Mayor Howard to control all appointments of the City Council.

To the PRU Crew's surprise, this item was referred back to the Procedures and Regulations committee for further discussion. It is our hope that committee and council members choose democracy over dictatorship, but we're not holding our breath.


6) Finally, under the Finance and Budget Committee report, we read that the City Council plans to authorize Mayor Howard to sign a lease agreement (.pdf) for parking spaces at 20 S. Fairview Ave. We are pleased to see that the City will pass through all parking space rental costs to those leasing the spaces, but we do wonder why the City will be providing bookkeeping and secretarial services to SCH Real Estate LLC, free of charge. We also wonder why the City's required disclosure of ownership (.pdf) documents have not been provided by SCH Real Estate LLC in accordance with the City's ordinance.

Finally, the City Council adopted the lease agreement for the parking spaces at 20 S. Fairview, and will now be providing SCH Real Estate LLC with free bookkeeping and secretarial services.

A member of the audience asked Mayor Howard if the long rumored participation of his wife, Nancy Frimark, as a beneficiary in the trust and/or SCH Real Estate LLC that holds title to this property is true. Mayor Howard stated that the rumor is "absolutely false." Certainly, Mayor Howard wouldn't lie about such a thing.

We look forward to seeing the required disclosure of ownership documents for this agreement; the City law is very clear -- disclosure of ownership interest is required.

There you go folks! A quickie recap of 1,137 words for your reading enjoyment!

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here's a suggestion for the mayor and the city council: No spending for anything "new" until all our old stuff is fixed.

No Cumberland underpass, no new cop shop, no new library (or new addition), etc. until our streets are paved, our curbs are fixed, our sewers are upgraded. We can't even maintain the steps at the Uptown METRA station - they're already crumbling and the things they call "railings" are just a bunch of pipes!

And this still being Crook County and Illinois, there should still be enough opportunities for graft and corruption with these maintain/repair/replace projects to satisfy whichever public officials might be looking for such things.

Anonymous said...

Howie--your pants are on fire.

Anonymous said...

Some of this sounds crazy! The Mayor really said the federal taxes aren't our money? What is he thinking?

It is plain dumb to propose the Cumberland underpass but not be familiar with the area because you don't drive that route. If you are going to propose something you are supposed to do your homework!

Reggie said...

The Cumberland underpass is all about getting Howard from his house on Aldine to the Country Club without having to wait for trains or traffic.

I seem to recall a couple of years ago he was against closing Meacham for the redevelopment because his route from his office on Touhy to the PRCC was up Meacham to avoid the six corners.

Its also about his buddy Bill Napleton getting more traffic past his Lincoln dealership, or increasing the value of that piece of land.

Not to mention increasing the value of the land for his buddies at Baileys.

I can understand Howard not knowing that there is a large park with baseball fields on the other side of the tracks, since he has never raised any kids in Park Ridge (despite showing up for the Baseball Opening Day dog and pony show), but to claim to be unfamiliar with the area simply illustrates his ignorance.

Please, someone, anyone run against him! Heck, can we get Ron W back from Barrrington? While Ron was tilting against the airport windmill and the evil mayor daley, at least he let staff run the rest of the town fairly well. Actually, he did an outstanding job compared to meddling Howard, but of course that is not saying much. Most Brownie troups are run better compared to the job Howard is doing.

Anonymous said...

I think it is VERY safe to assume that there are campaigns being pulled together at this very minute.
Those who are running, please let us know, as we would like to donate to your campaign.

Reggie said...

Never assume . . .

If there are lurking candidates, speak up!

I will donate, pass petitions, put up signs, what ever it takes to end this nightmare.

Anonymous said...

So....who wants to run?

Reggie, you up for it?


Kovic?


Anyone?

Anonymous said...

Very interesting........
What can we do to see that
Howie goes bye bye ...next election
that is.

Anonymous said...

So when Cumberland goes through Busse and dead ends at Hinckley Park what happens then?

Anonymous said...

Reggie,

I am right there with you.

MIKE said...

Well the Train Station and the area around it is the responsabilty of Metra though come to think of it the city might of been responsable for building the current train station though correct me if I'm wrong on that.

As for Cumberland extention we forgot to mention how it would be impossible to get Cumberland to go under the tracks cosidering how close Busse is to them and it would be very hard for northbound car to drive up from under the tracks.



Also not that I'm defending the mayor in anyway but how do we know he has never rasied kids here?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Mike,

First off, it's perfectly o.k. to defend the Mayor on anything you may wish to. The Crew would appreciate the check and balance.

Secondly, "we" know the Mayor has never raised kids here because many people are familiar with the Mayor's family history, or lack thereof. On the face of it, not having raised kids doesn't make anyone more or less fit for a given position. But we will say that the experience of having raised kids does lend certain benefits to someone in taking a longer view on many topics. That being said, there is a necessary benefit in the views of those who are either childless by choice, circumstance, or finished with the task -- as we find many parents in the throes of parenting can be a bit over-the-top in what they believe their children are entitled to be provided with by the community.

MIKE said...

Well the main reason I said what I said is because like so many here I'm not all fond of Frimark.

Also the reason why I asked about about the kids part is because I typed up his name which is how I found this site and some other site which I can't remember what it was says Born in Found Du Lac WI, no birth year though graduated from high school in 1961. It also gave some claim of him having 2 kids. And since he's actually resided here in PR for 36 years, according to the PR website, I figured that any children he might of had would of grown up here.

Anonymous said...

I'm with Steve Macko. From what I've seen, Reggie would make a great mayor.

Reggie said...

Mike,

The two kids were the full grown children of his second (current) wife. HOward just claims them to seem like a "family" man.

But as far as ever changing diapers, coaching t-ball, softball, or baseball, going on an Indian Princess or Scouts campout, attending parent-teacher conferences, arranging play dates (as opposed arranging the "temporary waitresses" for Plae Day), ol Howie just wants you to believe that his is just like those of us who have really done all that while raising our families here in PR. While he has never claimed to have done all that, he certainly wants you to believe that he has.

Its all that honesty and integrity that will be the buzz words of his re-election campaign.

PRU.ADMIN said...

Reggie,

Your first statement is unfair if not unfounded. You cannot attest to Mayor Howard's feelings for his blended family by stating "he only claims them to seem like a "family" man." You cannot know his true feelings for them.

Politicians that don't take advantage of their families as prolitical props are far and few between.

And now a general PRU.ADMIN reminder/warning to all posters here -- be careful where you tread on the personal lives of elected officials.

Public policy is a better subject for discussion.

Reggie said...

Oops. I let my conservative views of a traditional family cloud my post, when I should have stuck to the facts.

The question was:
"how do we know he has never rasied kids here?"


Fact: Howard's first marriage ended in divorce in 1996. He and Barbara had no kids.

Fact: Twelve years later, there are no little Frimarks running around North Aldine or Bonita Springs.

Fact: Nancy had two older kids when she married Howard. (I am sure they are nice people)

Draw your own conclusion.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the majorty of the positions posted here on PRU (not all but the majority). However, when I read some of the comments posted in support of these positions I am left scratching my head. Am I really on the same side as people willing to go so far out of bounds in supposed defense of their position? Whatever the issue might be (PADS, under/overpass, police station etc.) there is plenty of data to support opposition without making assumptions about a persons family life/history.

Pru.admin is dead on. Keep it public policy.