July 22, 2008

All That Jazz! Abridged Council Recap!



Hello, PRU readers! The reports have come in and we're going to cut right to the chase; last night the Park Ridge City Council voted unanimously to refer the matter of opening a homeless shelter to the Planning & Zoning commission for addition to the zoning ordinance under the requirement and review through a special use permit process.

You read that right folks! Unanimous! Even the perennially confused Alderman Don DreadBach (3rd Ward) and Benedict Alderman Robert Ryan (5th Ward) voted to require a special use permit process for the opening of a homeless shelter at St. Paul of the Cross, or anywhere else in Park Ridge.

There was an overflow crowd in attendance at the meeting last night, which prompted Mayor Howard to issue one of his infamously rambling decrees on council decorum and respect.

We're told that Mayor Howard is another one of those "preachers" who can't seem to manage much in the way of his own personal practice. In addition to the less than equal treatment certain speakers were subjected to by the meeting chairman, Mayor Howard, we are told that at one point during the meeting, while speakers addressed the council, Mayor Howard called a gentleman from a list of names of those wishing to speak. The gentleman declined to speak but did add, "Please protect our children, Mr. Mayor." Mayor Howard then told the gentleman that if he had anything to say he should "be a man" and step up to the podium. Mayor Howard's remark reportedly elicited a very negative response from the audience. So much for decorum and respect.

We're told that there were well over 40 speakers, the significant majority of whom favored the process of a special use permit for a homeless shelter. We are also told the majority who urged the council to vote for the special use permit process also requested that not only St. Paul of the Cross be required to apply for the special use permit, but also that PADS too be required to apply as a co-applicant, since it is that agency that will be performing the services they allegedly provide to the homeless population, as well as the agency that will be responsible for following their own policies for the protection of their volunteers and the rest of the community. The PRU Crew could not agree more with that idea; PADS must be a co-applicant for the special use permit process for opening a homeless shelter.

Also in attendance was the Chicago Archdiocese in-house lawyer, Maureen Murphy, who seemed to be present to figuratively hold the hand of Fr. Carl Morello. Ms. Murphy let everyone know that the parish would "only be hosting" the shelter, "not leasing or licensing" their space, and that the Archdiocese does not believe a special use permit could be required...but if it is required then the parish would go through the process. It's clear to the PRU Crew that Ms. Murphy is unfamiliar with not only the concept of an in-kind contribution, but also recent Federal court law. And now we see why continuing education requirements are as important for attorneys as they are for other professionals.

So now the issue will move to the Planning & Zoning commission for review, where members of the public will again have a chance to ask that their concerns and questions about homeless shelters be answered. Stay tuned!

In other City Council actions, Fair Housing commissioner, former Alderman Sue Bell, after giving another impassioned plea for understanding that we are told was rife with misleading statements, was handed her hat and shown the door, despite the Lord of the Manor's attempt to defer adoption of the ordinance yet again. The council voted, in its first reading, to adopt the fair housing ordinance as currently written. No more whining. No more nagging. No more delays. No more behind the scenes maneuvering. The reason posed for yet another delay, besides Ms. Bell's whining, was to give the new City Manager, Mr. James Hock, time to review the ordinance and his role in it. If history is any teacher, and the PRU Crew believes it is, Mr. Hock will be able to deal with one pseudo-fair housing complaint every decade or so.

We again give out some PRUdos here, and today they go to Alderman Jim Allspaghetti (4th ward). Nice job getting this thing finally done.

Finally, action on the R-5 zoning issue was again deferred until the next meeting.

We know there was more but our sources apparently pooped out and left the meeting before it ended, past midnight.

Overall, we feel the City Council did a reasonable job of listening to the issues and concerns from residents of Park Ridge. We wish somebody among their number would take Mayor Howard aside and clue him in on how this whole "representative of the people" thing is supposed to work.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

oh, I TOTALLY forgot about the new City Manager. Welcome to the jungle, Mr. Hock!
Thanks for the recap. How nice that Howie was in true form for the TV cameras. We are soooo proud!

Anonymous said...

If St. Paul is only "hosting" the PADS shelter program, as the archdiocese's attorney pointedly pointed out...then it sure seems to me that PADS is the business entity (a secular non-profit or otherwise) that should be applying for the special use permit...just as the Christie's pre-school was required to do...

I might go so far as to say that St. Paul's is the much "lesser" entity necessary to the special use permit process...as their sole role is merely as "host" to PADS Inc., as the archdiocese's attorney pointedly pointed out...

The City would not seem to have an interest in any financial arrangements between a church and its' designated agent(s)...whether the church rents or donates their space seems out of the scope of the City's interests in my view... However, the City sure does have an interest in businesses that operate within its' borders...and the effects those operations might have on the rest of the community...whether those effects are increased parking demands or increased panhandling demands...

PADS should be required to apply to go through the SUP process...

Anonymous said...

The Mayor's conduct last night was childish. Worse still, he showed a complete lack of leadership, the same lack he has exhibited from the start. When Alderman Schmidt asked the Mayor for his view on a special use requirement, he mumbled, fumbled and then simply said he would respect the City Council's decision. That's taking a stand for you. Where has he been all this time? If he had used his influence over Father Morello and his mouthpiece, Jack Owens, months ago, then much of the acrimony and pain brought on by this proposal could have been avoided. Shame on the mayor for putting his own political fortunes ahead of the residents.

Reggie said...

You said: "Shame on the mayor for putting his own political fortunes ahead of the residents."

I said: "You must be new to town."

Anonymous said...

This will...end up in the high courts. Watch and see.....

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

we don't have the money for legal fees in PR. But the archdiocese does.

Anonymous said...

OK. I guess this is good news but can someone explain the special use permit process. I imagine they have a set of criteria that must be met for a given entity to receive a permit. I am sure some of it is related to general facility safty and fire code. Are these criteria static or do they change? Are new ones added? How the hell does this work?

I guess my thoughts are that this is good from a review stand point but I cannot see that requirements could be put in place that SPC could not reasonably meet. Doesn't this just delay the inevitable?

Someone help me out. What am I missing?

Anonymous said...

why is it so quiet today--both on the blog and in the city? feels like something is "lurking" and there are things going on underneath. is that right?

Anonymous said...

Echoing Alderman Ryan here: "Dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue dialogue"

Unbelievable!

Anonymous said...

The archdiocese doesn't go around suing people....they really can't afford to, for starters, and think of the bad publicity / negative public relations - they really can't afford that, either.

PADS would have to bring its own suit - but that would bring their dirty laundry into the open, they don't want that... and they are not a religious entity, so they have no standing to pursue a 1st amendment cause.

And recent court decisions in this very federal circuit are not in their favor, either. Makes the prospect of filing a claim altogether not a sunny one.

That, coupled with the shift in sentiment exhibited last night by the council, makes me think PADS at SPC might get defeated after all, [not that I am counting chickens before they hatch]. But the quietude today does worry me, too. It's too weird.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like this mtg was a bunker buster!

As for Sue Bell - we know that she is one who cannot give up the power trip as well as the control.

I think all the cards will fall if and when Gov. Blago - goes, Howie goes, Rosemary goes and the rest of the little rascals....Don't forget get Kotowski and his 7th ward co - harts too. We can all be proud of the taxes here in crook county - thanks to Stroger..what a mess!

Great job on all levels - they really believe that the city of Chicago still runs the county and the state.

It's call mission creep....and its here in Pk Ridge - now.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I don't really understand the thing about Sue Bell.
What was she whining about? what was her "impassioned plea"?
Did they really kick her out?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

Anon@10:48 --

Sue Bell is a former alderman and is now an appointed member of the Fair Housing Commission, which has been in existence for a long time but was almost totally inactive.

Sue Bell's plea to the council was for more--repeated answers to why the Procedures and Regulations Committee has limited the commissions role to conducting reconcilliation hearings only after the City Manager finds grounds to move a complaint forward. Previously, under the original ordinance form, the commission would investigate, concilliate and adjudicate the complaint -- clearly raising conflict of interest and prejudice issues. The commission also wants to be able to order "studies" to be done on "fair housing" matters. Conducting studies necessitates expenditure of city resources, something that only the council should be authorized to do. The commission also, originally, wanted subpeona powers, a new licensing ordinance for landlords to be created, and lists of ALL landlords renting in Park Ridge. And the Procedures and Regulations Committee also received complaints about the commissions' members unilaterally approaching the school district to ask for inclusion of their issue into the district's elementary curriculum.

What Sue Bell and the other members of the Fair Housing Commission have whined about is that the Procedures and Regulations Committee has said no to their requests, repeatedly, for nearly a year.

The Procedures and Regulations Committee seemed to have finally had enough of the nonsense of repetitive requests, repetitive referrals back to their committee for still more review, and decided to bring the matter to the full Council once and for all, and the ordinance has now passed its first reading.

When we said Sue Bell was "handed her hat and shown the door" we did not mean that in the literal, physical sense; we thought everyone would understand it as the cliche phrase it is used as so often.

Anonymous said...

Shouldn't PRU have been there last night and not relied on second hand reports?

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

We trust our crew and sources. You don't have to though, and we invite you to add to or refute anything we've reportd that you observed for yourself.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 23, 2008 1:07 PM,

I was at the meeting. The PRUs report is accurate. What would you like to know about?

Anonymous said...

Second hand reports will more often than not be biased. Especially on such a hot issue like this one. Build credibility by being there for the big events not relying on second hand sources to make fun of these alderman and this mayor. PRU you certainly bring a different side of Park Ridge up that us citizens don't read about in the Advocate, but to compete with the Advocate you have to become more reliable than the common blogger. Which by relying on all second hand news is basically what you are doing right now.

ParkRidgeUnderground said...

First hand reports have as much potential for being as biased as any other reports.

The difference between us and the Advocate or Journal is that we don't bother to pretend to be unbiased.

We state our bias openly.

If you find we lack credibility because of the way we do things, then by all means, don't read our reports, or read our reports with a skeptical eye. Doesn't bother us either way.

Anonymous said...

PRU:

I love your response. It seems like too many americans have advocated their right to think. There has always been a given slant to articles from any given news source but it used to be that some of them at least tried to be impartial and report the news (granted they often failed). What has happened over time is that the news has become a place to advocate a position. If you watch MSNBC you are getting the left wing position. If you watch FOX you are getting the right wing position. It so obvious but they pretend to be unbias. What scares the hell out of me is that people watch one or the other and don't even to have to think about their position. There position is reaffirmed by what the are watching. It doesn't matter if the facts are distorted beyond recognition.

I think this site is great, not because I agree with everything I read here - far from it. I like this site because it forces me to look at things from an angle that is sometimes not natural to me. It makes me think!

Anonymous said...

anonymous @ 1:27--you, yourself, should sit through these meetings and see what a circus it is, led by the king of clowns himself.
the reporting is quire accurate.
what is difficult is that it's the truth that is reported on this site, which isn't necessarily what everyone in PR wants to hear.